Tags
architecture building codes christopher alexander city networks Community complexity Death and Life of Great American Cities emergence emergent construction fractals Fractal Urbanism geometric programs Homeowners' Association Jane Jacobs La Defense Le Corbusier Leon Krier London mandelbrot set medieval city Mediterranean towns Modern Architecture modernism Natural Landscapes networks New Towns new urbanism New York organic city Parisian boulevards Place Planning process random growth Rem Koolhaas Space Syntax Sprawl Stephen Wolfram structured chaos subdivision sustainable development symmetry urban design Urban Morphology Urban Processes urban tissue-
Recent Posts
- To walk the path of Jane Jacobs – review of What We See, Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs
- The practice of complex urbanism and other updates
- The manifesto of the Emergent Urbanism Network
- The patterns of place
- Leon Krier's lesson in architecture
- New introduction to Emergent Urbanism
- An empty city for sale
- Emergent Urbanism at the University of Montreal
- Defining a new traditional urbanism
- Poundbury in China
- Review of Radiant City
- Decoding Sidi Bou Sa'id
- The rules for changing rules
- Lake country
- Fake complexity: traffic control
Recent Comments
- Milton Friesen on To walk the path of Jane Jacobs – review of What We See, Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs
- Where In The World Am I? - Page 86 - Nordinho.net Community on Poundbury in China
- William Spiritdancer on Review of Home by Yann-Arthus Bertrand
- William Spiritdancer on Review of Home by Yann-Arthus Bertrand
- Mathieu Helie on Review of Home by Yann-Arthus Bertrand
- Francois on Review of Home by Yann-Arthus Bertrand
- Catbus on To walk the path of Jane Jacobs – review of What We See, Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs
- Donovan Gillman on The complex grid
- Donovan Gillman on The rules for changing rules
- Serrano on Don't demolish Detroit
- Stephen on The Journey to Emergence
- Yodan Rofe on How they build today in Palestine
- The practice of complex urbanism and other updates | Emergent Urbanism on Urban complexity in the practice of urbanism
- Fred Weiss on How they build today in Palestine
- fmgm on The manifesto of the Emergent Urbanism Network
Links on Complexity
Links on Urbanism
This site is sponsored by
Shop online for Bike Helmets and accessories
Welcome to Emergent Urbanism
This website explores urban planning and design in a new light, that of complexity science and the phenomenon of emergence. It attempts to show how great cities are the result of individuals building something that is unique to themselves and combine with other individual acts to form a pattern that exists in a greater dimension. With this knowledge we can plan cities that share the complexity of nature and life, and all their qualities.
My name is Mathieu Helie. I am a graduate of the Institut d'Urbanisme de Paris, Universite Pantheon-Sorbonne and Concordia University, a student of urban planning, economics and computer science, and this is my part of the complexity revolution.
This blog provides as much content as an e-book, with more value. Students can read for free. For professionals, the recommended donation is 5$. Click to donate.

If you have any links or news stories to contribute, please post them on the Emergent Urbanism Network; they will automatically be syndicated on this site.
For my consulting services in web development and spatial complexity, see mthl.info. For any other questions, write me at mhelie@gmail.com.
-
Subscribe
-
Support Emergent Urbanism
Consume something that makes you smarter!
-
Cinderella architecture
If you ever find yourself speaking to an architect at a party, most likely the word transparency and the supposed need for it is going to come up over and over. This is a recent concern for the building arts. Modern architecture, traditionally, has been philosophically focused on honesty of materials, or the meaning of forms. Transparency is in a way a renunciation of architecture. Its purpose is to make the form of a building as unnoticeable as possible. Architecture just gets in the way, so making it unnoticeable is the best design choice. Nothing is the new something.
Glass-covered office buildings have been the norm for decades, mostly because corporations are not taken in by architectural fashion and just want regular, boring, functional floor space. The glass curtain wall dominates the office parks and central business districts the world over. The physics of light being what they are, for most of the business day the building offers nothing but a mirrored glass box to the world, or for worse buildings, repeating checkerboard or line patterns (Class II behavior in Stephen Wolfram’s categories). The Houston-style CBDs have been described as soulless and boring, But something strange happens when the sun sets. The soulless, boring cluster of glass boxes becomes a setting worthy of postcards. A glass city at night has a completely different emotional and psychological effect on its visitors, something I’ve witnessed many people express, and have felt myself.
The patterns that the interior of an office building takes are controlled by its inhabitants, and, so far as the architect who designed the thing is concerned, purely random. And what happens at night to a glass tower is that the architecture of the building, the geometry controlled by the architect, blacks out and becomes indistinguishable from the background, while the lit floors are exposed for everyone to see. This nocturnal geometric transformation we can call the phenomenon of Cinderella architecture.
That a soulless glass city becomes beautiful at night cannot be accounted for only by lighting. A parking lot is lit up at night as well, and no one feels any better about it. Instead, I believe that the phenomenon of Cinderella architecture is an example of structured chaos. The office buildings, while no longer being themselves visible, create common frames within which random events are pictured. These random events can be as simple as lights being switched on or off, and can go into deeper details such as the placement of furniture. The result, seen from far away, is a geometric pattern that is overwhelming in complexity, especially when occurring in thousands of windows over dozens of buildings.
Looking for evidence of this phenomenon, I went to Paris’ version of the Houston CBD, the La Défense office city in the first ring outside Paris, in the sunset hours of a working day. La Défense holds a reputation for having the most boring kind of corporate architecture, but even this small district benefits from the Cinderella effect. Here are some pictures that I hope will illustrate my point.
The regular day-time modern business district.
The same spot at night.
The lower floors of the building on the left are not occupied and the visual complexity of the building suffers from it.
This building was one of the first built on the site, and is one of the most obsolete, but it lights up as much as any other at night, if not more.
How can the most routine kind of modern corporate architecture be creating such complexity? The answer is that it is not the buildings that create the complexity, it is the people living in them, adapting their environment to suit their activities. What makes it beautiful is the common frame that this adaptation takes place in. The frame is the architecture, the complexity is the adaptations that people make with it.