<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why build cities anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergenturbanism.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergenturbanism.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/</link>
	<description>Rediscovering urban complexity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luca</title>
		<link>http://emergenturbanism.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathieuhelie.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>There is in fact considerable literature as to why cities emerge. It&#039;s generally, as you point out, accepted that there is a benefit in physical proximity for certain activities (ranging from physical protection, to marketing, etc.).

Re. the granularity of buildings and organic vs. planned city issue, I would submit that there is a need for both and that both can complement each other. Generally, granular/organic works better and is more flexible but there are important programmatic needs that cannot be met purely through organic/small scale, gradual growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is in fact considerable literature as to why cities emerge. It&#8217;s generally, as you point out, accepted that there is a benefit in physical proximity for certain activities (ranging from physical protection, to marketing, etc.).</p>
<p>Re. the granularity of buildings and organic vs. planned city issue, I would submit that there is a need for both and that both can complement each other. Generally, granular/organic works better and is more flexible but there are important programmatic needs that cannot be met purely through organic/small scale, gradual growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scale-free urban systems &#171; Emergent Urbanism</title>
		<link>http://emergenturbanism.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Scale-free urban systems &#171; Emergent Urbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathieuhelie.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] 28, 2008 &#183; No Comments  In previous comments, I have argued that what makes cities different than building projects was the fact that they had to deal with change an..., and that subdivision-planned developments were economically inferior to random growth. These [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 28, 2008 &middot; No Comments  In previous comments, I have argued that what makes cities different than building projects was the fact that they had to deal with change an&#8230;, and that subdivision-planned developments were economically inferior to random growth. These [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Marketplace City &#171; Emergent Urbanism</title>
		<link>http://emergenturbanism.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>The Marketplace City &#171; Emergent Urbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathieuhelie.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/why-build-cities-anyway/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] in an air-conditioned environment had merit, but it&#8217;s obvious at this mall that it ran into the problem with all monolithic constructions; the future is unpredictable, and the unpredictable has to be built somewhere. One could have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in an air-conditioned environment had merit, but it&#8217;s obvious at this mall that it ran into the problem with all monolithic constructions; the future is unpredictable, and the unpredictable has to be built somewhere. One could have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
